ASV Matthew 22:11-14
But when the king came in to behold the guests, he saw a man who had not on a wedding garment.
Photo by Gez Xavier Mansfield on Unsplash
Why is this ponderable?
- Augustine of Hippo interpreted the garment as symbolizing charity,
- Martin Luther suggested that the garment represented Christ himself.
- John Calvin felt these controversies in interpreting the meaning of the "wedding garment" was a useless controversy; faith cannot be separated from good works, nor do good works proceed from any other source than from faith.
- James L. Resseguie suggests that the missing wedding garment is an object that supports the plot and the motivation of the characters. It merely reveals the guest's lack of desire to be at this feast.
- Bernard Brandon Scott notes that the parable immediately follows the parable of the Wicked Husbandmen in Matthew, and that the man without a wedding garment represents servants hired by the king (God) who do not perform their duties,i.e. wear proper garments to the feast.
- To see a relative or friend get married, even if they are not invited.
- To accompany another person who is invited and wants a companion
- To mooch free catered food or alcoholic beverages.
- To steal money or gifts from the bride, groom, or guests.
- To get revenge, when the bride or groom is an enemy of the person doing the crashing.
So the lack of a wedding garment was likely used by Jesus to convey the motivation of this mythical wedding crasher. His intentions were evil and had no place in a feast meant to celebrate love and joy. So he was cast out into the darkness to join kindred spirits. He and many like him may have been called into the feast, but only those with pure intentions were selected by the king.